منابع مشابه
On the Aristotelian Square of Opposition
A common misunderstanding is that there is something logically amiss with the classical square of opposition, and that the problem is related to Aristotle’s and medieval philosophers’ rejection of empty terms. But [Parsons 2004] convincingly shows that most of these philosophers did not in fact reject empty terms, and that, when properly understood, there are no logical problems with the classi...
متن کاملThe Square of Opposition in Orthomodular Logic
We give an interpretation of the Square of Opposition in an orthomodular structure enriched with a monadic quantifier.
متن کاملThe analysis of the generalized square of opposition
In this paper, we continue the development of a formal theory of intermediate quantifiers (linguistic expressions such as “most”, “many”, “few”, “almost all”, etc.). In previous work, we demonstrated that 105 generalized syllogisms are valid in our theory. We turn our attention to another problem which is the analysis of the generalized Aristotelian square of opposition which, besides the class...
متن کاملLong-Distance Reflexives and the Binding Square of Opposition
We present data showing that, unlike other long-distance anaphors widely documented in the literature, the Portuguese ele próprio is not subjectoriented. This supports a reformulation of Principle Z, encompassing subject-oriented and non subject-oriented long-distance anaphors, which shows up as the fourth binding principle. The striking internal congruence of the resulting four principle based...
متن کاملThe Ontological Modal Collapse as a Collapse of the Square of Opposition
The modal collapse that afflicts Gödel’s modal ontological argument for God’s existence is discussed from the perspective of the modal square of opposition. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). Prim. 03B15; Sec. 68T15.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
سال: 1976
ISSN: 0029-4527
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1093887725